| Should Bamiyan Giant Buddhas Be Rebuilt? |
|
|
|
A horseman passes a mountain face
where a giant Buddah once overlooked Bamiyan, Afghanistan. Mirza Hussain, and other
prisoners like him, had labored for hours to stack mines, bombs and dynamite
beneath the feet of Afghanistan s most iconic public artwork — a 175-foot
standing statue of the Buddha carved from the sandstone cliffs of the Bamiyan Valley
sometime in the 7th century. Bamyan, 29
June: Mirza
Hussain, and other prisoners like him, had labored for hours to stack mines,
bombs and dynamite beneath the feet of Afghanistan s most iconic public artwork
— a 175-foot standing statue of the Buddha carved from the sandstone cliffs of
the Bamiyan Valley sometime in the 7th century. Finally, the local Taliban
commander blew his whistle, and hundreds of observers plugged their ears, held
their breath and waited for the Buddha to fall. It didn t. The first load of
explosives only destroyed the statue s feet. "They were
disappointed," says Hussain, of the Taliban leaders who had decreed in
March of 2001 that the famous Buddhist monument was idolatrous, and would be
demolished. Initially, Taliban fighters had fired at the Buddha with assault
rifles, stinger missiles and RPGs, to little effect. When the stacked
explosives at the statue s base failed, Hussain and other prisoners were
dangled over the edge of the cliffs to stuff dynamite into holes in the soft
stone. "Our soldiers are working hard to demolish the remaining
parts," announced Mawlawi Qudratullah Jamal, the Taliban s minister of
information and culture, at a press conference in Kabul a day later. "It
is easier to destroy than to build."
He was right. Within days the
Taliban had all but decimated the remains of a magnificent Buddhist
civilization that had for six centuries ruled this strategic valley at the
crossroads of Central Asian trade. They rampaged through the caves that
honeycomb Bamiyan s cliffs, smashing thousands of smaller Buddha sculptures.
They chiseled intricate frescoes from the walls, and where they weren t able to
tear off the plaster, they gouged out the eyes and hands of those depicted.
Locals say the figures in the images bore facial features typical of the
Hazara, the persecuted Shi ite minority group that populates the province. The
Taliban massacred hundreds of Hazaras when they took control of Afghanistan;
many in the valley believe that the destruction of the Buddhas was an extension
of their genocidal campaign. "The Buddhas had eyes like ours, and the
Taliban destroyed them like they tried to destroy us," says Marzia
Mohammadi, a midwife. "They wanted to kill our culture, erase us from this
valley."
Seven years on, archaeologists and
volunteers from around the world are doing what they can to put the symbols of
Bamiyan s Buddhist legacy back together again. Piles of shattered rock lie
stacked under shelters of corrugated iron and plastic sheeting where the
Buddhas once stood. Under debate, right now, is the question of how and whether
the statues should be rebuilt. Little remains of the stucco coat and sculpted
stone that gave the Buddhas of Bamiyan their definition. Putting them back
together again would be akin to piecing together a puzzle of a million pieces —
but without the benefit of an image printed on the box top. Nevertheless,
Habiba Sarabi, Bamiyan s governor, believes rebuilding the Buddhas is important
for the psychic well-being of her province. "The Buddhas were a part of
the life of people in Bamiyan," she says. "Now the empty niches of
the Buddhas affect the landscape, so the people share the sorrow."
In a process called anastylosis,
original fragments of damaged statuary can be pieced together with cement or other
materials — as has been done at Cambodia s ancient Angkor Wat temple complex.
But if less than half of the original material remains, says restoration
experts, the new structure loses its historical value, and should be considered
a replica. And being rebuilt as a replica could put the World Heritage Site
status of the Bamiyan Buddhas at risk. Archaeologists have estimated that about
50% of the original stone remains, but a full study has yet to be completed.
Abdul Ahad Abassy, head of
Afghanistan s Preservation and Restoration of Historical Monuments department,
sees a pattern in the Taliban s efforts to take down the Buddhas. One of
Afghanistan s early Islamic kings tore through the caves in the 11th century,
smashing idols as he went. And at the end of the 19th century the mother of
then King Abdul Rahman had cannons fired at the standing Buddhas. Afghan
history, he says, is filled with characters who attempt to erase the past.
They, too, are part of Afghanistan s heritage — a heritage that it is his job
to preserve. So, Bamiyan s Buddhas present a conundrum. Brutal though it may
have been, the Taliban legacy is an important part of Afghanistan s recent
past. The empty niches of Bamiyan are testament to a ruthlessness that should
not be forgotten — rebuilding the Buddhas would be a kind of erasure. "The
present condition of the buddhas is in itself an expression of our
history," says Abassy. "No matter how good or bad the Taliban were,
we cannot tear that page from the book."
Governor Sorabi sees a Solomonic
compromise that both respects Afghanistan s recent history while celebrating
its ancient culture. "We have many empty niches to be reminders of the
dark parts of our history," she says. "If we rebuild one Buddha, we
can leave the other as it is."
Source : www.chnpress.com |


